A Detour Through Tinsel Town, 1910… Via Coos Bay,Oregon

You never know where historical research might take you…

I was looking around on the Internet this week, hoping to learn the full name of one P. C. Levar of Coos Bay, who had been editor and publisher of the Marshfield Coast Mail newspaper around the turn of the 20th century. While I was unable to discover what the “P. C.” stood for, I did unearth some unexpected information about the man’s writing career. As I discovered, Levar’s legacy rests not so much on anything he wrote while editor of the Coast Mail.  Rather, to the extent that he is still remembered today, it is largely owing to a letter of his that was published in the early film journal, Moving Pictures World.

The letter–in which Levar criticizes the Biograph Film Company for their underhanded replacement of the actress originally known as the ‘Biograph Girl’–is clear evidence that the Hollywood ‘star system’ was already beginning to develop in 1910. Levar’s epistle  is such an early and unambiguous example of what would eventually come to be known as ‘fan mail’ that the letter has been referenced, quoted, and even reproduced whole in a number of books about the formative days of the film industry, including Tom Gunning’s D.W. Griffith & the Origins of American Narrative Film, Eileen Bowser’s The Transformation of Cinema, 1907-1915, and Florence Lawrence, The Biograph Girl: America’s First Movie Star by Kelly R. Brown.

Here is the complete text of P. C. Levar’s letter:

Letter from P.C. Levar of Coos Bay, OR to 'Moving Picture World' magazine, january 30, 1910
Levar’s letter to Moving Pictures World, as reprinted in Gunning, Tom. ‘D.W. Griffith and the Origins of American Narrative Film’ (1994: University of Illinois Press)
‘Biograph Girl’ Florence Lawrence: the object of P.C. Levar’s admiration.

Although he does not use her name (probably he did not even know it, as film actors were not credited in those days), the ‘true and original’ Biograph Girl whom Levar favors is almost certainly Florence Lawrence.  Lawrence is generally regarded by film scholars as the first true American movie star. Hers was an eventful, very colorful, and ultimately tragic life. Readers who would like to learn more are directed to her biographic entry in the northernstars movie database, as well as Mary L. Grau’s lengthy and detailed Blog article. At Chronicling America, a name search of all papers presently digitized yields 100 pages  with information on Florence Lawrence (see one exemplary page below). As if that weren’t enough, you can also read about her contributions to automotive engineering history. (Yes, the same Florence Lawrence!)

Biggest Movie Stars of 1916: Florence Lawrence is pictured lower left. From New-York Tribune (New York, NY) January 16, 1916, pg.18

After her relationship with Biograph ended, Lawrence went on to work for other pioneering film production companies, including Lubin Studios, Independent, Universal and Victor. She would appear in more than 270 pictures; at the height of her career earning more than $1 million per year. Prints of her films have become rare, but on YouTube you can view her work in the 1909 Biograph short, ‘Those Awful Hats.’   Jason A. Stone

Happy Birthday, Abigail Scott Duniway

Abigail Scott Duniway, acclaimed as “Oregon’s Mother of Suffrage,” was born on October 22, 1834. That makes today a most opportune time to announce that the suffragist newspaper that Duniway published and edited, The New Northwest of Portland, has been confirmed as our final title for digitization in NDNP phase 1!

We had to clear a couple of hurdles with this one:

1.) Confirming that The New Northwest qualified for funding based upon both NDNP project guidelines and the formalities of serials cataloging. Could Duniway’s journal rightly be called a newspaper, or was it more accurately a magazine? This may sound like hair-splitting, but these distinctions truly matter in the world of the library. We were pleased that The New Northwest was judged to be a newspaper, and therefore qualified for inclusion in NDNP.

2.) We discovered that our library’s service copies of The New Northwest microfilm were not matched by master negatives in our archive. In fact, we had none of the negatives on hand at all! Luckily, we managed to track down negatives at the Oregon Historical Society, who have generously agreed to provide us with copies of the negatives. (Libraries, museums, and other cultural heritage institutions generally circulate positive prints, but are often much more reluctant about sharing copies of their master negatives. OHS really was exceptionally co-operative here, so thanks are due to them!)

2012 will mark the 100-year anniversary of woman’s suffrage in Oregon. Cultural institutions throughout the state will be commemorating this milestone, and we are very pleased that the paper that was at the forefront of the struggle, The New Northwest, will be available and accessible to the public via our digital resource.

Political poster from 1912 campaign for woman's suffrage in Oregon.
Poster from 1912 campaign for woman's suffrage in Oregon. (from Oregon Historical Society, OHS digital no. bb004107)

In the meantime, Abigail Scott Duniway’s life remains, as always, a fascinating and informative subject.  Oregon Public Broadcasting has substantial Duniway web pages that are a great starting place for learning more about “the pioneer suffragist of the great Northwest.” For a wider overview of the history of woman’s rights and citizenship in Oregon, Kimberly Jensen’s article from the Oregon Historical Quarterly is recommended.

Microfilming the Astorian

Those who follow our project may recall Karen Estlund’s trip to Astoria last February. In a previous Blog post, it was reported that she had returned to Eugene with a carload of historic Astorian newspapers on loan from the Astoria Public Library. Has anyone wondered what became of those issues?

While we have used existing microfilm as a source for most of our page scans, the Astorian was identified early on as a title that could use a good upgrade in filming. The existing microfilm had mostly been photographed half a century ago, from bound volumes of issues that were often in an exceedingly poor state of preservation. All of this was less than ideal. So, when it became apparent that we would have the budget to fund refilming of one title, the Astorian was an easy choice.

Now that this work has been completed, let’s take a moment to review the process of microfilming an historical newspaper–the work of our colleagues in the Image Services Department of Knight Library.

Heidi Scheidl in image services lab.
UO Image Services student employee Heidi Scheidl prepares issues of the Daily Astorian for microfilming. (photo by Mandi Garcia)

The first step in the microfilming process is to guillotine any issues that have been bound between covers. This is because pages that are filmed while still bound tend to produce gutter shadows, areas of uneven contrast and exposure, and other flaws. A far superior filmed image is obtained from a page that can be laid perfectly flat. Next comes a review of collation to make sure that issues and the pages within issues have been placed in the correct, chronological order. As page numbers were not originally printed on the Astorians, the numbers were hand-written in light pencil, in order to facilitate both filming and later page-searching by library patrons. At this stage, any wrinkles in the pages were also flattened using a steam iron, and rips and tears were mended with Filmoplast, a non-reflective adhesive tape specifically designed for archival paper documents.

Planetary Microfilm Camera
Generic image of Kodak MRD-2 Planetary Microfilm Camera, as used at UO Image Services

Once the Astorians were fully prepped, they were then routed to the camera room. Here they were filmed using our planetary microfilm camera. The pages are placed on a flat copyboard and exposed to 35mm film stock. A positive print is struck from each master negative film reel, in order to check the quality of the filming work. When a reel passes quality review, the master negative is then duplicated to produce a negative copy that can be handled by collators with ODNP and, eventually, passed on to our vendor for digital scanning. The original negative is the archival copy.

More or less, this was the process followed for all 11,960 pages of the Astorian that were re-filmed for our project. You can judge the results here:

Daily Astorian, January 2, 1889 pg.3 as originally filmed
Daily Astorian, January 2, 1889 pg.3 refilmed version

Heidi Scheidl, the student employee who completed most of this work, reports that she very much enjoyed handling the old Astorians. “I had a chance to read a lot of the articles,” Heidi says. “It gave a really good taste of what the 19th century writing style was like.”

For those who would like to learn more about the processes and history of microfilm and other imaging technologies, here is a website full of information and fun retro photos!  —Jason A. Stone

Ready For Football?

Another exciting season of college football is set to kick off this weekend, so it’s an ideal time to revisit the sports pages of yesteryear on Chronicling America.

With the University of Oregon Ducks preparing to defend their Pac-10 Conference title–and the Beavers of Oregon State once again looking like a formidable challenger for the Roses–we turn all the way back to the year 1917. This was the year that an Oregon team made its first January trip to Pasadena for the postseason game that would later come to be branded as the “Rose Bowl.” In those days, the team from the East was always regarded as a prohibitive favorite. Such was the case when UO faced off against the University of Pennsylvania.

1917 “Rose Bowl”, from the Philadelphia (PA) Evening Public Ledger, January 2, 1917. Night Extra, page 16.

It is an interesting exercise to compare coverage of the game from journals on the opposite coasts. In its January 2nd recap, the Klamath Falls Evening Herald sticks mostly to a blow-by-blow account of the action on the field. The post-game article in the Evening Public Ledger of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania focuses rather more on analysis and excuses for the game’s unexpected outcome. Published a week later, Penn team captain Neil Mathews’ reflection demonstrates good sportsmanship as the author attempts to balance the two perspectives on the big game.

Interesting trivia to note from these articles:

  • Circa 1917, Oregon’s uniform colors were “blue and lemon yellow.” Green came later, apparently.
  • The 25,000-30,000 in attendance were, at this time, the largest audience ever for a game on the West Coast.
  • This contest, along with Cal’s defeat of Brown University in the previous year’s game, was instrumental in earning respect for college athletics in the West. The assumption had been that Eastern and Midwestern teams were inherently superior in both talent and tactics.
  • Even at this early date, we hear of the controversial relationship between college sports and money. “The primary object of the game,” writes the reporter from Evening Public Ledger, “was to swell the receipts of the football season, and in this respect it was a success.”

Enjoy the season!

Learning From Old Media

This week I am choosing to highlight and article by Brian Veseling originally published on the IFRA website.

Learning from old media” explores news website design strategies that have been drawn from the page layout techniques of newspapers of yesteryear. The author discusses creating dramatic headlines, highlighting the best elements of each article, organizing information around hierarchies of value, and bundling ‘packages’ of related content. There are many scans and screen shots illustrating both the contempoarary and historic application of these techniques.

This is interesting stuff for those of us who are frequent users of online news sources. It also offers something of a “mirror image” on our project to convert historic papers to new media digital formats. I was fascinated to learn how old tricks of the typesetters’ trade continue to have relevance in how news gets disseminated via cutting-edge technology, as well as an ongoing impact upon our perceptions of the information that is presented to us.

1912 Fireworks Show

Hope everyone had a fun and festive July Fourth.

Oregonians have long been accustomed to celebrating the holiday with fireworks… as the front page of the July 4, 1912 Klamath Falls Evening Herald will attest. Note the article occupying the three center columns in the lower half of the page: ‘Magnificent Display Fire-works On Lake To-night.’

The paper records a full itinerary of the pyrotechnic novelties to be shot off that evening. Apparently, 1912 citizens and guests of Klamath Falls enjoyed a show of ‘Aerial Wrigglers,’ ‘Fire Swans’, ‘Meteorites,’ ‘Monster Glow Worms,’ ‘Floating Gyroscopes’ and even a battery of  ‘President Taft Inauguration Bombs.’ How did your local fireworks show compare in 2010?

Just a timely little reminder to explore the Oregon newspaper content that’s recently been made available on Chronicling America!

So, What’s The Big Noise???

While collating a microfilm reel of the Coos Bay Times from 1912, our student assistant, Sommer, came across a mysterious item billed as The Big Noise. It looked a lot like an issue of the Times, but the title was different, and there was no date or issue number. A glance at the paper’s masthead quickly revealed its humorous intent.

Coos Bay, Oregon's answer to Mad Magazine or The Onion - Circa 1912!

A little more digging through this issue’s contents told more of the story. Billed as “A Foolishhouse Paper Printed Once in a Lifetime–That’s Enuf,” the Big Noise is in fact a satire of the Coos Bay Times that seems to have been produced as a unique promotional handbill/program for the “Vaudeville and Minstrels” variety show staged for charity by the local chapter of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks. The paper makes it clear that this event was to be held on the evenings of December 5th and 6th, 1912, at the Masonic Opera House in Marshfield.

The Big Noise was printed on the presses of the Coos Bay Times, and was evidently designed to parody that respectable local journal. Scattered among the “joke” ads printed in the Noise are many for actual, local businesses that regularly advertised in the Times — Ekbald & Son Hardware, Hub Clothing and Shoe Company, Owl Prescription Pharmacy, the S.S. Breakwater, etc. — but with the standard marketing copy altered to gently tease the proprietors. It can be assumed that many of these local businessmen were members of the Elks Lodge. Other prominent local figures are parodied in the ‘news’ articles and humorous cartoons that fill the paper, such as the two reproduced below.

On page 4, the ‘Editor’ of The Big Noise explains: “This paper was published to inform, instruct and amuse, make glad and mad the various members mentioned herein… The paper contains some information, bits of wisdom, and numerous scandalous lies and misrepresentations of our friends, who will have to stand for it… There will be no mud slinging in this paper. Only the very best quality of Coos River bottom soil will be used.”

We were surprised and excited to find this early predecessor of satirical papers like The Onion or National Lampoon produced in small-city Oregon just after the turn of the last century. What a unique document… and what irreplaceable insight into the “lighter side” of life in 1912 Marshfield!  —Jason A. Stone

Thank you, Professor William James

As with any historical project, the Digital Newspaper Program sometimes takes on the character of detective work. Here’s an example from the past week in the office.

While performing verification on the latest batch of digital scans we received from our vendor, I happened across the following image and caption in the pages of the Salem Willamette Farmer:

My eye was drawn to this and I was inspired to copy the image in order to later share it with John Taylor, the Quality Control Specialist on our project. John is currently a graduate student in the department of Philosophy here at the U of O. One of his areas of concentration is pragmatist philosophy, and this quarter he’s been taking a truly immersive class on James. I intended this to be nothing more than a lighthearted demonstration that the digitized papers will feature content of relevance to all of us, no matter our field of study. But then the plot thickened…

While John didn’t immediately recognize “The Powers of Men”–the “most talked of” article by James cited in the photo caption–he thought it was probably an alternate title for James’ famous work, “The Energies of Men.” I started doing a little research to confirm this, and quickly determined that John was almost certainly correct. However, a new problem now came to light: the date of the Willamette Farmer issue this came from was April 20, 1883… yet all the bibliographic sources I was finding indicated the article’s date of publication as 1907. We were suddenly facing a mystery of rather overt anachronism.

In search of an explanation, I referenced our collation records for the paper in question. The records listed this issue as ten pages; the Farmer was usually published as eight pages. The two extra pages–including the one with Prof. James on it–were notated as a ‘special advertising section.’ No date, issue or volume number were recorded on these pages.

With this information in hand, the most likely explanation began to take shape: the ‘special section’ does not belong with this issue at all–it is contaminant material! It was doubtlessly published at a much later date (sometime between 1907 and James’ death in 1910), but erroneously got collated in with these pages of the Farmer when they were originally being sorted and bound for library use. Then, sometime later, this mistake was perpetuated when the volumes were microfilmed. We probably wouldn’t have caught it, either… except that I copied the photo to share with John. Pragmatically, you’d have to say we got a bit lucky. Thank you, Professor James!  —Jason A. Stone

First Look At Digitized Pages

I’ve been busy performing quality control on the first batch of page scans and OCR files I’ve received from our vendor. So far, I’d have to say that they really do impressive work!  Here’s an example to illustrate the digital image quality.  We’ll start by looking at the front page of a Portland New Age (vol. 9 no. 35, issued December 22, 1906)–pictured here at about 30% of original document size:

Here is a screen shot of a word from the main body text of the page shown above (small point size!) It has been enlarged to about 2x its actual size on the page:

Here is an illustration from the same issue–again, enlarged to about twice the size at which it was originally printed:

The resolution, sharpness and contrast of the digitized pages are very good. Our vendor can de-skew, contrast-correct and otherwise “clean” the images for maximum legibility, while still maintaining the “newsprint” look of the originals. With scans of this quality, we are confident of our ability to provide Web service of the newspaper content that is both highly useful and user-friendly.

An Oregon Bestiary

As regular readers will already know, the first digitized content from historic Oregon newspapers should be coming online by the fall.  In preparation, we’ve been reviewing and collating some great old papers.  This intensive process doesn’t always afford us as much opportunity to pause and read the articles as we’d like… but, from time to time, a headline or graphic is simply too compelling to avoid catching our attention.

That was certainly the case with these woodcut illustrations, which first ran in the July 26, 1862 issue of the Jacksonville Oregon Sentinel.  With tongue planted firmly in cheek, the accompanying article tells the tale of a group of intrepid explorers venturing into the Oregon wilderness in search of trout.  Instead, they end up encountering a far more incredible native fauna:


Consider this a sneak peak at some of the more esoteric news content that ODNP will soon be making available on the Web.  And remember… when out and about in Oregon, watch out for those Bandikoots!  —Jason A. Stone